La prescription d’un traitement homéopathique se fait en prenant compte des symptômes spécifiques du patient ce qui implique un interrogatoire plus long et ne peut se faire qu’une fois le diagnostic posé, et lorsque la prise en charge selon les dernières recommandations de la Haute Autorité de Santé a été proposée au patient.

Ainsi, la prescription d’un traitement homéopathique ne peut se faire que lors de consultations dédiées pour les problèmes de santé chroniques, ou éventuellement sur des consultations standards dans le cadre de pathologies aigues

Les consultations spécifiques d’homéopathie durent 40 minutes environ et sont facturées 60 euros, soit 25 euros de consultation classique pris en charge par la Sécurité Sociale et 25 euros hors nomenclature.

Ces consultations sont accessible aux nouveau patients, bien que le cabinet ne prenne plus de nouveau patient en tant que médecin traitant pour les suivis classiques.

Pour en savoir plus sur homéopathie uniciste :

Site de l’Institut National d’Homéopathie Française :

https://www.inhfparis.com/index.php/lhomeopathie-uniciste/presentation-generale-2/

Site de l’association des patients utilisateurs de l’homéopathie :

https://www.ahpfrance.org/

Pour les plus curieux, quelques études cliniques sur les effets de l’homéopathie et des hautes dilutions :

1) Bell I, Lewis D, Brooks A, Schwartz G, Lewis S, Walsh B, Baldwin C (2004). Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo. Rheumatology; 43: 577–582.

lien internet : https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/43/5/577/1788410

62 patients

Results. Fifty-three people completed the treatment protocol. Participants on active treatment showed significantly greater improvements in tender point count and tender point pain, quality of life, global health and a trend toward less depression compared with those on placebo.

2) Jacobs J, Jimenez LM, Gloyds SS, Gale JL, Crothers D (1994). Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine; a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua. Pediatrics; 93: 719–725

lien internet : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8165068/

81 patients

RESULTS: The treatment group had a statistically significant (P < .05) decrease in duration of diarrhea, defined as the number of days until there were less than three unformed stools daily for 2 consecutive days. There was also a significant difference (P < .05) in the number of stools per day between the two groups after 72 hours of treatment.

3)Jacobs J, Springer DA, Crothers D (2001). Homeopathic treatment of acute otitis media in children: a preliminary randomized placebo-controlled trial. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal; 20: 177–183

lien internet : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11224838

75 patient

RESULTS: There were fewer treatment failures in the group receiving homeopathy after 5 days, 2 weeks and 6 weeks, with differences of 11.4, 18.4 and 19.9%, respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant. Diary scores showed a significant decrease in symptoms at 24 and 64 h after treatment in favor of homeopathy (P < 0.05). Sample size calculations indicate that 243 children in each of 2 groups would be needed for significant results, based on 5-day failure rates

4) Frass M, Linkesch M, Banyai S, Resch G, Dielacher C, Lobl T, Endler C, Haidvogl M, Muchitsch I, Schuster E (2005). Adjunctive homeopathic treatment in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in an intensive care unit. Homeopathy; 94: 75–80.A18   

lien internet :  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15892486

70 patients 

RESULTS: Three patients (2 homeopathy, 1 placebo) were excluded from the analyses because of incomplete data. All these patients survived. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, prior conditions, APACHE II score, signs of sepsis, number of organ failures, need for mechanical ventilation, need for vasopressors or veno-venous hemofiltration, and laboratory parameters were not significantly different between groups. On day 30, there was non-statistically significantly trend of survival in favour of homeopathy (verum 81.8%, placebo 67.7%, P= 0.19). On day 180, survival was statistically significantly higher with verum homeopathy (75.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.043). No adverse effects were observed.

5) Chapman EH, Weintraub RJ, Milburn MA, Pirozzi TO, Woo E (1999). Homeopathic treatment of mild   traumatic brain injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation; 14: 521–542.

lien internet :https://journals.lww.com/headtraumarehab/Abstract/1999/12000/Homeopathic_Treatment_of_Mild_Traumatic_Brain.2.aspx

60 patients 

Results: Analysis of covariance demonstrated that the homeopathic treatment was the only significant or near-significant predictor of improvement on DSS subtests (P = .009; 95% CI − .895 to − .15), SRS (P = .058; 95% CI − .548 to .01) and the Ten Most Common Symptoms of MTBI (P = .027; 95% CI −.766 to −.048). These results indicate a significant improvement from the homeopathic treatment versus the control and translate into clinically significant outcomes.

6) Thompson EA, Montgomery A, Douglas D, Reilly D (2005). A pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of individualized homeopathy for symptoms of estrogen withdrawal in breast-cancer survivors. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine; 11: 13–20.

lien internet : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15750359

57 patients 

RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (85%) (45/53) of women completed the study. There was no evidence of a difference seen between groups for either activity (adjusted difference =-0.4, 95% confidence interval CI -1.0 to 0.2, p = 0.17) or profile scores (adjusted difference = -0.4, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.1, p = 0.13) using this trial design, although post hoc power calculations suggests that 65-175 would be needed per group to detect differences of this magnitude with sufficient precision. Clinically relevant improvements in symptoms and mood disturbance were seen for both groups over the study period.

7) Yakir M, Kreitler S, Brzezinski A, Vithoulkas G, Oberbaum M, Bentwich Z (2001). Effects of homeopathic treatment in women with premenstrual syndrome: a pilot study. British Homeopathic Journal; 90: 148–153.

lien internet : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11479782

20 patientes

resultats : improvement >30% was observed in 90% of patients receiving active treatment and 37.5% receiving placebo (P=0.048). Homeopathic treatment was found to be effective in alleviating the symptoms of PMS in comparison to placebo

8) Homeopathy in acute otitis media in children: treatment effect or spontaneous resolution?

Br Homeopath J. 2001 Oct;90(4):180-2.

lien : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11680801/

230 patients

Results : Pain control was achieved in 39% of the patients after 6 h, another 33% after 12 h. This resolution rate is 2.4 times faster than in placebo controls. There were no complications observed in the study group, and compared to conventional treatment the approach was 14% cheaper.

9) Homeopathic arnica therapy in patients receiving knee surgery: results of three randomised double-blind trials.

Complement Ther Med. 2006 Dec;14(4):237-46. Epub 2006 Oct 13.

319 patients

lien :https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=2006%5Bpdat%5D+AND+Brinkhaus+B%5Bfirst+author%5D+AND+arnica&TransSchema=title&cmd=detailssearch

resultats : A total of 227 patients were enrolled in the ART (33% female, mean age 43.2 years;), 35 in the AKJ (71% female, 67.0 years), and 57 in the CLR trial (26% female; 33.4 years). The percentage of change in knee circumference was similar between the treatment groups for ART (group difference Delta=-0.25%, 95% CI: -0.85 to 0.41, p=0.204) and AKJ (Delta=-1.68%, -4.24 to 0.77, p=0.184) and showed homeopathic arnica to have a beneficial effect compared to placebo in CLR (Delta=-1.80%, -3.30 to -0.30, p=0.019).

10) Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? A meta-analysis.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997 Dec;25(4):628-33.

lien :https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=1997%5Bpdat%5D+AND+Barnes+J%5Bfirst+author%5D+AND+ileus&TransSchema=title&cmd=detailssearch

resultats : Meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) weighted mean difference (WMD) in favor of homeopathy (compared with placebo) on the time to first flatus. 

11) Management of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Patients ≥ 65 Years of Age by Homeopath General Practitioners versus Conventional General Practitioners, with Overview of the EPI3-LASER Study Results.

Homeopathy. 2018 May;107(2):81-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636536. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

 Etude prospective 110 patients, non randomisé, non controlé

lien abstract : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558779

resultats :One hundred and ten patients were recruited and 87 (79.1%) with ADD (HADS ≥ 9) at the 72-hour interview were evaluated (age range: 65-93 years, 82.8% female). Patients who consulted a GP-Ho (médecin généraliste homeopathe) were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 10.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-81.07) to have clinical improvement (HADS < 9) after 12 months than those in the GP-CM (médecin généraliste conventionnel) group. Patients who consulted a GP-Ho reported less psychotropic drug use (OR = 22.31 [95% CI: 2.20-226.31]) and benzodiazepine use (OR = 60.63 [95% CI: 5.75-639.5]) than GP-CM patients.

12) Homeopathic and conventional treatment for acute respiratory and ear complaints: a comparative study on outcome in the primary care setting.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Mar 2;7:7.

1577 patients

lien : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Homeopathic+and+conventional+treatment+for+acute+respiratory+and+ear+complaints%3A+A+comparative+study+on+outcome+in+the+primary+care+setting

resultats : - The majority of patients in both groups reported their outcome after 14 days of treatment as complete recovery or major improvement (H: 86.9%; C: 86.0%; p = 0.0003 for non-inferiority testing)

- within the first 7 days after treatment was significantly faster upon homeopathic treatment both in children (p = 0.0488) and adults (p = 0.0001).

-  Adverse drug reactions occurred more frequently in adults of the conventional group than in the homeopathic group (C: 7.6%; H: 3.1%, p = 0.0032), whereas in children the occurrence of adverse drug reactions was not significantly different (H: 2.0%; C: 2.4%, p = 0.7838).

13) Effectiveness, Quality of Life, and Cost of Caring for Children in France with Recurrent Acute Rhinopharyngitis Managed by Homeopathic or Non-Homeopathic General Practitioners

Disease Management & Health Outcomes June 2004, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 419–427 

lien : https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00115677-200412060-00009

499 patients

resultats : - The effectiveness (assessed as complications/patient, total number of adverse events, and quality of life) [mean overall Parents of children with Ear, Nose, and Throat infections Quality of Life questionnaire© scale score] was better in the homeopathic GP group than in the non-homeopathic GP group

-Homeopathic GPs initiated preventive treatment in 82.2% of their patients and used antibacterials in 20.9% of their patients, while non-homeopathic GPs initiated preventive treatment in 43.3% of patients and prescribed antibacterials for 89.6% of patients.

14) Homeopathy in chronic sinusitis: a prospective multi-centric observational study.

Homeopathy. 2012 Apr;101(2):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2012.02.002.

lien : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22487367

628 patients, étude non controlée

résultats : - There was a statistically significant reduction in CSAS (P = 0.0001, Friedman test) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Radiological appearances also improved

- No complications were observed during treatment.

15) Is homoeopathy a placebo response? controlled trial of homoeopathic potency, with pollen in hayfever as model 

THE LANCET Volume 328, ISSUE 8512, P881-886, October 18, 1986

144 patient

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2876326/

resultat : The homoeopathically treated patients showed a significant reduction in patient and doctor assessed symptom scores. The significance of this response was increased when results were corrected for pollen count and the response was associated with a halving of the need for antihistamines

16) Mathie, R.T., Lloyd, S.M., Legg, L.A. et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 3, 142 (2014) doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-142
lien : https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-3-142#citeas

Articles scientifiques de recherche fondamentale sur l’homéopathie et les hautes dilutions :

1)Ultra-diluted Toxicodendron pubescens attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokines and ROS- mediated neuropathic pain in rats

lien: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31971-9

2) Nanoparticles Characterisation of Traditional Homeopathically Manufactured Cuprum Metallicum and Gelsemium Sempervirens Medecines and Controls

lien : https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034926/EFirst/lookinside/10-1055-s-0038-1666864_1700006-1.jpg

Mis à jour le 11 Mars. 2023